On May 28, 2013 the Kyiv District Court of Simferopol held hearings to choose the measure of restraint for Haiser Jemilev, son of the Head of the Mejlis of Crimean Tatar People<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Court decided to keep Haiser Jemilev in Simferopol pre-trial prison (for 60 days) until July 25, 2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This decision was made by the judge of the Kyiv District Court of Simferopol Mr Victor Mozhelyansky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to Haiser Jemilev\u2019s advocate Mr Alexander Lesovoi, the suspect\u2019s arrest was awaited and reasonable measure at this stage of the investigation, considering the grave consequences and need in numerous investigative actions, examinations and expertise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cHaiser Jemilev\u2019s father, Mustafa Jemilev understands the whole gravity and difficulty of the accident. He made no attempts to influence the investigation and decisions, realizing that the state bodies that have the authority to investigate the circumstances of the death have to make the reasonable and legal decisions,\u201d- Mr Alexander Lesovoi noted. \u201cIf the court decided to keep the suspect in custody for 60 days, one has to accept this decision and wait for the results of the investigation that started just now,\u201d- Mr Lesovoi said, referring to the suspect\u2019s father.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One should note that the practice of the European Court shows that the arrest in the beginning of the investigation in many cases is the reasonable and right measure, but with the course of time the grounds for the imprisonment become less necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to Mr Lesovoi no evidences provided by the prosecution or stated at the court session by now prove to Haiser Jemilev\u2019s intention or desire to kill Fevzi Edemov. \u201cHaiser Jemilev said that it was an accident,\u201d- Mr Lesovoi underscored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to Mr Lesovoi, the circumstances of the accident are also important and testify to the absence of an intention. \u201cFevzi Edemov was not shot dead neither at night nor in a desert place or in a hidden way,\u201d- Haiser Jemilev\u2019s advocate explained. \u201cHe was shot dead in broad daylight, around 3.30 p.m. in the center of the development with numerous neighbors around. One couldn\u2019t kill anyone intentionally under these circumstances,\u201d- Mr Lesovoi said. In addition, the advocate drew the attention that after the accident Haiser Jemilev remained at the scene. He didn\u2019t try to cover or erase the traces of his actions, but pleaded guilty in reckless killing and immediately informed his father and asked him to come to the scene as soon as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Haiser Jemilev\u2019s advocate also thinks that the prosecution prematurely stated that there were three shots and that they shouldn\u2019t state this before the court experts made their conclusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cUntil the medical examiner won\u2019t make his conclusion using the results of the reproduction of the circumstances and conditions of this accident we won\u2019t know for sure how many shots were made at the scene,\u201d- Mr Lesovoi noted. He drew the attention to the objective fact that only one cartridge was found at the scene.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
On May 28, 2013 the Kyiv District Court of Simferopol held hearings to choose the measure of restraint for Haiser Jemilev, son of the Head of the Mejlis of Crimean Tatar People The Court decided to keep Haiser Jemilev in Simferopol pre-trial prison (for 60 days) until July 25, 2013 This decision was made by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44579","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n